Small Rockets for the
Masses?
Captain Monty Mendenhall
Gyrojet
The
‘space race’ between the US and the USSR began in earnest in 1957.
The Soviet Union captured the high ground by orbiting the
world’s first artificial satellite and reaped enormous national
prestige.
In his
recently published papers, the US’s number one rocket scientist of the
cold war era, Wernher von Braun, stated that the US could have orbited a
crude satellite in 1956 and beaten the Russians into space.
According to von Braun, political considerations prevented him
from launching one.
An orbiting
satellite would have unavoidably passed over the Soviet Union.
In 1957, the limits of a nation’s vertical airspace were
undefined. There was fear
among US politicians, that an over flying US satellite would provoke a
confrontation with the Soviet Union.
Von Braun felt that the order to put an orbiting US satellite on
hold, came straight from President Eisenhower.
After
launching a satellite that over flew US airspace every ninety minutes,
the Soviet Union was hardly in a position to be critical of future US
satellite over flights of her own territory.
Four days after the successful Soviet satellite launch, US
Secretary of Defense Quarles met with President Eisenhower and observed,
“The Russians have in fact done us a good turn, unintentionally, in
establishing the concept of freedom of international space.” (Quoted
from Curtis Peeble’s book,
“The Corona Project”)
Though
allowing the Soviet Union be the first into space and reap world
prestige humbled the US, the decision to delay the US’s first
satellite was probably best. Had
the US launched the first artificial satellite, the USSR almost
certainly would have protested and likely prevented, or at least
forestalled future US satellite launches.
Another possibility, had von Braun been permitted to launch the
first artificial satellite, the US would never have been perceived to
be, ‘behind the Russians,’ and there would never have been the
national enthusiasm that was required to support the tremendously
expensive ‘space race’ which concluded with a US landing on the
Moon.
Discoverer
The
Discoverer satellite program was the first successful
series of US satellites. The
program was aptly named too. Under
the cloak of scientific research, the primary goal of the Discover
mission was to take high-resolution photographs of the entire Soviet
Union. Early in the
program, there were many failures.
The first completely successful Discoverer flight was number 18
and what a success it was. The
data captured on that flight alone, was worth far more than the amount
that the US had spent on the entire space program.
Discoverer 18 revealed that the much-vaunted Soviet bomber force
was a hollow shell and that there were far fewer Soviet ICBMs than US
experts had estimated.
Discoverer
18 also photographed the launch complex at the secret Soviet space
center. These photos
revealed a recent Soviet space disaster of enormous proportions.
It was evident that a huge rocket had exploded on the launch pad.
A photographic search of nearby cemeteries revealed many new
graves. It was years
later though before the true extent of this Soviet disaster was
revealed. Among those
killed in the accident was the commander of the Soviet Strategic Rocket
Forces, Marshal Mitrofan I. Nedelin. Though a great loss, probably much
more damaging to the USSR’s space program, was the death of Mikhail K.
Yangel. Yangel was the
Soviet Union’s equivalent of the US’s Wernher von Braun.
Also killed were a host of government officials, rocket engineers
and technicians.
The data
gleaned from Discover 18 revealed the USSR’s weaknesses and changed
the US’s foreign and space policy forever.
MBAssociates
Almost lost
in the excitement over the huge US space program, were the discoveries
and developments of Robert Mainhardt and Arthur Biehl.
While most of the US’s rocketry research was concentrated on
building larger and larger rockets, MBAssociates, Mainhardt and Biehl,
were developing rockets that weighed less than one ounce.
They called their tiny 13mm (.51 caliber) rockets,
‘Gyrojets.’
Mainhardt
wrote, ”In 1960, MBA expended a great deal of effort to prove that
little rockets – under
one inch in diameter – could
be developed to be cost effective for various applications.
The world experts said it couldn’t be done.”
One
development was to ‘make a gun that could fire small rockets.’
We tooled up for a six shot, low cost, no recoil handgun that was
foolproof and cheap. These
guns were die cast out of aluminum, magnesium or zinc alloy (except for
springs and screws).”
Mainhardt
continued, “These guns worked and the unit cost was low, so you could
give one to every Vietnamese farmer.
The late Vietnamese President Diem was given the first gold
plated model. He then gave
his ‘village chieftains’ silver plated ones.
The ‘village chieftains’ were to give every farmer a plain
one. Then, guess what? The
working farmers didn’t want them.
They said, ‘Why should we shoot the Viet Cong?
They only come to get their ‘tax ration’ of rice.
We know we will either have to give them some rice or give some
to Saigon, so who cares?’ ”
Thus ended the “Rocket
Guns For Rice Farmers” program.
More
MBA Developments
Robert
Mainhardt continued, “Many other products (besides the rocket guns)
were devised from the early efforts of Art Biehl and myself.
We built some seven million signal flares using the Gyrojet
rocket engines.” In addition to the Gyrojet pistol, MBA also developed
and marketed Gyrojet carbines, Gyrojet inserts for 12 gauge shotgun
barrels and Gyrojet underwater spear guns.
Though the
12mm Gyrojet rockets were made in the greatest quantities, other
calibers were made as well. These
Gyrojet calibers included .16, .25, .30, .38, 13mm, 20mm, 30mm and 40mm.
Because
Gyrojets are rockets, they place little stress on the launcher and have
almost no recoil. A Gyrojet
launcher for the largest 40mm ammo could be lightweight.
Firing one from the shoulder in either the semi auto or full auto
mode would be both possible and practical.
Area
Saturation
Mainhardt
added, “We also made hundreds of thousands of fin stabilized rockets
(called MBA Finjets) of under 1/8 inch diameter (1.5 inch length) that
flew at Mach 2 (1400 mph).”
The
original purpose of the tiny Finjet was to saturate an area with high
kinetic energy projectiles. This
concept was never fully explored. The
MBA Finjet may have been the inspiration though, for a weapon once used
in a ‘James Bond’ motion picture. No actual connection is known, but
Bond’s ‘last ditch cigarette rocket weapon’ looked much like an
MBA Finjet.
Stabilization
Differences
Gyrojet
rocket ammo and Finjets are stabilized using different principles. The
Gyrojet has no fins. Having
no external projections makes it more suitable for use in a magazine fed
weapon. To stabilize it, the Gyrojet must have two or more rocket
nozzles. The nozzles are
canted to impart a stabilizing spin to the small missile. A standard
13mm Gyrojet rocket rotates at about 3600 revolutions per second
(216,000 rpm).
Simplified
fin stabilized Finjets only required one rocket nozzle. Though no cost
figures have been revealed, it was likely the less expensive of the two
rockets to manufacture.
Even
smaller and simpler than the fin stabilized MBA Finjet is the 1/16 inch
diameter, 1.5 inch long, MBA Lancejet.
Like an early Chinese skyrocket, with a long stabilizing stick
instead of fins, the tiny MBA Lancejet’s length stabilizes it to some
degree. As for its intended
use, Mainhardt states, ”Multiple salvos of these lower velocity
subminiature rockets exhibit characteristics similar to Finjets, but
elimination of the fins provide unique advantages.”
Left
unstated by Mainhardt (perhaps due to ongoing research), are the
specific advantages of the Lancejet. One potential use for the finless
Lancejet would be as ammo for a very high speed Gatling gun type of
rocket launcher. With low weight and little recoil, a weapon of this
type could be mounted on a light utility vehicle or a small helicopter.
This type of weapon might be ideal for area saturation.
Classified
New Uses?
MBA
developed larger versions of the Lancejets.
Mainhardt described them as, “Javelin stabilized rockets with
excellent penetrating and warhead carrying ability.
Payload volume is sufficiently large to carry an impressive
explosive or incendiary charge, capable of inflicting substantial
primary damage and able to detonate explosive or inflammable targets to
produce secondary damage. Lancejets
pack like simple rods.”
In 1980,
Mainhardt proposed a method to protect ICBM silos with a system called
‘Swarmjet.’ An excerpt
from his proposal stated, ”Our most significant force deficiency…
will be the vulnerability… of our fixed silo ICBMs. … There is a
solution called… called Swarmjet… using large numbers of relatively
small high velocity rockets fired in salvos to ‘kill’ incoming
ICBMs.”
Further,
but classified, work may still be being going on with larger versions of
MBA Finjets and Lancejets. A
large salvo of tiny rockets might be an effective final, very close
range, defense against anti-ship missiles.
Another use might be for intercepting an incoming ICBM at high
altitude, before it could release its MIRVs.
The final stage of the anti-missile missile would launch a salvo
of thousands of tiny rockets toward an incoming MIRV platform.
Simple
Rockets
With Complex Technology
A Gyrojet rocket consists of eight
components. The largest is
the hollow rocket case. It
is made of high tensile strength steel to withstand the 2500 psi of
internal pressure caused by the very hot combustion gases and the high
centrifugal forces caused by rotating at 3600 revolutions per second.
The second component of the Gyrojet is
the base. The third and
fourth components are contained within the base. In the center of the
base is a percussion primer. Arranged
symmetrically on the outer perimeter of the base are two, or more,
rocket nozzles. The nozzles
are canted to impart a stabilizing spin to the rocket.
The spin is calculated to be three turns per foot of linear
travel. In rifle barrel
terms, this would be a very fast twist ratio of one turn in four inches.
TThe
Gyrojet’s nozzle material must have a precisely defined erosion and
ablation rate. If the
nozzles burn or erode unevenly, asymmetrical thrust will be produced.
If that occurs, the rocket will become destabilized, destroying
its accuracy.
The fifth component is the propellant.
Solid rocket propellant containing metal, and therefore having a
high density, can give high thrust. Due to safety considerations
however, Gyrojet rockets use a propellant that is quite similar in
composition to double-based nitro cellulose gunpowder.
Mainhardt stated, “Non-metalized double-based propellants
(gunpowder) cannot detonate (explode).
They can only deflagrate (burn).
A composite or metalized propellant is probably unsuitable for
use in a hand held weapon.”
Another
consideration for choosing a double-based nitrocellulose propellant
instead of a metalized one, is that the combustion gases of gunpowder
type propellants are relatively clean and non-toxic.
The combustion gases of metalized propellants are both corrosive
and toxic. Neither trait is desirable, especially for indoor defense
use.
Cost benefits also resulted from using
a double-based nitrocellulose propellant instead of a metalized one.
Gunpowder type propellant is much less expensive than the
metalized type. Moreover,
the metalized propellant is very erosive.
Rocket nozzles for gunpowder type propellants can be made from
cold rolled steel. Metalized propellants require the use of more
expensive nozzles that are made of ceramic or from other exotic
materials.
Gunpowder
type propellants are relatively simple and safe to work with. Using
‘dowling’ and ‘pencil sharpening’ machinery, MBAssociates formed
the double-base nitrocellulose powder into pointed cylinders. These
cylinders of propellant closely fitted the inside of the steel rocket
case.
Primer
ignition alone was insufficient to ignite the rocket propellant quickly
and uniformly. The sixth component of the Gyrojet
rocket was a sensitive chemical ‘initiator.’ The
‘initiator’ received the initial impulse of the primer and ignited
the propellant. To accommodate the ’initiator’ and to provide a path
for the combustion gases, the cylinder of rocket propellant was formed
with a tube-like hollow cavity in its center. The
‘initiator’ was placed inside the hollow tube.
To help reduce the rocket’s internal
pressure, a seventh component, a combustion inhibiting chemical
compound, was applied to the outside of the propellant cylinder.
In this way, the propellant could only burn from the inside. The
inhibitor prevented it from burning on the outside and raising pressures
to unacceptable levels.
Data
provided by MBA states that the maximum thrust of the gunpowder fueled
Gyrojet, is 3.2 kilograms or approximately 7.5 pounds.
This may not seem like a lot of thrust, but when applied to a
missile weighing only 185 grains, the thrust to weight ratio is an
astounding 284 to 1. For comparison, the combined thrust of a Boeing
777’s engines is 180,000 pounds.
The maximum takeoff weight is 640,000 pounds. A Boeing 777’s
thrust-to-weight ratio is only .281 to 1, about 1/1000th of a
Gyrojet rocket’s.
Like a B777
on take off, a Gyrojet rocket begins moving relatively slowly.
The Gyrojet’s fuel burns for 1/10 of a second.
When its fuel is consumed at sixty feet downrange, the unguided
missile has accelerated to a velocity of 1250 feet per second (FPS),
slightly greater than Mach one.
The last component the Gyrojet rocket
ammo is an aluminum membrane. It
is located between the nozzles and the propellant. The membrane seals
the case to prevent the entrance of moisture.
The primer and the internal pressure after propellant ignition
ruptures the membrane, permitting the burning gases to escape through
the rocket nozzles.
Wernher
Von Braun
Mainhardt kept Wernher von Braun
informed of MBA’s research into small rockets. Von Braun replied with
the following comments.
“I have read with interest…. the report that you recently
sent me. The considerations
in this very thorough treatment of miniature rocketry are reminiscent of
some of the problems we are encountering in our daily work, although
essentially at the opposite ends of the size spectrum.
The progress you have made in proving feasibility and usefulness
of these little rockets is noteworthy.
I foresee many valuable applications in the weapons field.”
The
Gyrojet Launcher
Looking much like a semi automatic
pistol, the seventeen-ounce Gyrojet rocket launcher is cast from zinc
alloy or aluminum. The only
precision made part is the extruded launching tube or barrel.
For accuracy, a very close fit is needed between the Gyrojet
rocket and the barrel.
Standard MBA Gyrojet pistols have a
five-inch barrel. A few
snub nosed models were made with two-inch barrels.
MBA also manufactured carbine style launchers for Gyrojet rocket
ammo. The operating
mechanisms of all three are identical.
The
velocities of the snub nosed pistol, the five-inch barreled pistol and
the carbine type launchers were identical.
This is easily explained. Unlike
normal cartridge ammo, the barrel length has no effect on the velocity
of Gyrojet rocket ammo. Most
of the Gyrojet rocket’s acceleration takes place after it has exited
the launching barrel.
To be
accurate, the Gyrojet rockets must fit the bore of the launcher very
closely. Twenty-four Gyrojet 12mm rockets were measured. They were very
consistent. All measured
.496 X 1.400 inch, plus or minus .0005 inch.
The tube’s inside diameter measured .499 inch. The average
clearance between the launching tube and the rocket was only .0015 inch.
Since the Gyrojet rocket is self-stabilizing, the tube requires no
rifling. The diameter of
13mm Gyrojet ammo is .511 inch. Like
the 12mm ammo, its diameter was very consistent also.
The
Mark I and Mark II Gyrojet launchers are much alike. Both hold
six rounds of rocket ammo in their grips.
They do not have detachable magazines.
The most noticeable differences are their methods of
‘loading’. The Mark I
is loaded through a port on the left side of the launcher.
A cover swings vertically to access it.
The Mark II has a retractable ‘slide’ over its ammo well. The
slide is retracted to load a MK II launcher.
To load
either launcher, first lower the hammer and place the safety to
‘ON.’ Next, open the loading gate (Mark I) or retract the
‘slide’ (Mark II) and press six of the Gyrojet rockets downward into
the grip. The follower is spring-loaded.
Be careful. All of
the rocket rounds will pop out of the grip if the loader’s thumb slips
off of the top round. Finally,
while restraining the rockets, close the loading gate or
‘slide.’
Multi-purpose
Hammer
The
Gyrojet’s hammer is located in front of the trigger.
Before firing the first round, cock the hammer forward and down.
When the trigger is pulled, the hammer moves up and backward.
It strikes the nose of the rocket and forces the primer against a
fixed firing pin that is located behind the rocket.
The Gyrojet
launcher’s safety restrains neither the hammer nor the trigger.
If the trigger is pulled when the safety is ‘ON,’ the hammer
will strike the rocket. The
rocket will not ignite however. When
the safety is ‘ON,’ a metal block moves up between the rocket and
the fixed firing pin, protecting the primer.
The
backward striking hammer is an inspired feature that simplified launcher
production and reduced costs while simultaneously solving a major
problem that is associated with spin stabilized rockets.
Since the hammer strikes the rocket on the nose, it blocks the
exit path of the rocket. When
the rocket moves forward, it recocks the hammer.
This simplifies the design and permits a quick second shot.
To achieve
a reasonable degree of accuracy, a spin stabilized rocket must be
allowed to ‘spin up’ before it exits the barrel. The
rearward pressure that is generated by hammer spring on the nose
of the rocket, restrains the rocket briefly to allow time for it to
‘spin up.’ Without the
restraint of the hammer, the Gyrojet rockets would leave the snub nosed
and five-inch barrels before they became stabilized. Without the
hammer’s brief restraint, there would be no hope of accurate fire.
Low
Volume Causes
High Production Costs
Gyrojet rocket launching pistols were
inexpensive to produce. In 1970 their retail price was $99.00 though.
For a gun that was produced with a level of technology that was
similar to making a cap pistol, that was a high price.
At that time, for comparison, the price of a S&W Model 10
revolver was about $100.00.
Manufacturing
Gyrojet rocket ammo was another matter entirely. It was expensive to
produce. The first batches
were made by hand using machine tools.
In 1965, it was priced at $1.35 per round.
By 1972, the retail price had increased to $3.00 per round.
Unverified by Mainhardt, but many RKIs feel that even at $3.00
per round, the rocket ammo was sold at a loss.
By the late 1970s however, there was little demand for Gyrojet
rocket ammo. Norbert Smoot,
a longtime FFL/SOT dealer, recalls “…seeing pallets of Gyrojet ammo
priced a $1 per box of six” at Davidson’s
Wholesale in Greensboro, NC.
Had Gyrojets achieved popularity and
high production rates, the ammo costs would have been more reasonable.
Robert Mainhardt maintained that, “Cost analyses showed that miniature
rockets and conventional ammo would cost about the same if produced in
the same quantities. ….both are fabricated of similar materials
- steel, double-based propellants, primers -
and both require approximately the same number of operations to
the same tolerances. It is
possible that future Gyrojet designs could be produced at less cost than
conventional ammunition.”
Unfortunately,
conventional ammo is produced at the rate of billions of rounds per
year, while Gyrojet ammo was produced at less than one million rounds.
There was little economy of scale for Gyrojet production.
Gyrojet
Performance
According to data published by
MBAssociates, standard 12mm Gyrojet rockets weight 185 grains and
achieve a burnout velocity, at sixty feet down range, of 1250 fps. Their
energy at the propellant burn out point is 700 foot-pounds,
approximately twice that of standard .45acp 230 grain ball ammo.
Early Gyrojet rocket production
suffered from a lack of quality control.
H. P. White Laboratories tested a batch of it in June of 1963.
About 20% of the rockets failed for various reasons.
Accuracy was unacceptable as well.
Initial dispersion averaged 20 mils of
circular error probability (CEP).
A second batch of 98 improved Gyrojet
rockets was tested later that year.
Three of them failed to ignite and seven more of the 98 rounds
required a second blow from the hammer before igniting.
Accuracy improved to 7 mils CEP or
about 7 feet at 100 yards. Though
better than the first tests, this must still be regarded as unacceptable
performance. One in ten
rockets failed to ignite on the first try.
Mainhardt later claimed to have reduced the failure rate to only
1%.
Gyrojets
and
The National Firearms Act
Gyrojet rockets are spin stabilized by
their canted nozzles. Hence,
they require no rifling. Early
Gyrojet pistols were smoothbore. As
soon as the BATF (Alcohol, Tobacco Tax Unit, or ATTU, in 1963) noted
that the Gyrojet handguns were smoothbore, they required that their
bores be rifled to avoid being classified as Title Two ‘Any Other
Weapons’ (AOW).
After the ATTU’s ruling, MBA engraved their new Gyrojet
launcher barrels with very shallow rifling to avoid the AOW
classification. A Gyrojet
rocket does not engage the rifling.
It will drop freely through the bore. The rifling serves no
purpose at all except to avoid the AOW designation.
Destructive
Device Gyrojets
Gyrojets were developed before the 1968
Gun Control Act was passed. Among
other things, the 1968 law created a new firearm category for firearms
with a bore diameter greater than fifty caliber, Destructive Devices
(DD). Prior to its passage,
a live cannon could be bought with no more difficulty than buying a
rifle. Many firearm
magazines from the early 1960s contained ads from Potomac Arms for
wheeled cannons. Readers
were urged to ‘buy one and tow it home.’
A 13mm Gyrojet’s bore diameter is
greater than .50 caliber. It
is .511 inch. That created
a problem for many who had legally bought 13mm Gyrojets prior to the
passage of the 1968 Firearms Act. If
they had missed the 1968 amnesty registration of them, they were in
possession of unregistered Destructive Devices.
Acting very
responsibly, MBAssociates requested and received permission from the
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Internal Revenue Service
(the name of the BATF in 1970) to convert the previously sold,
unregistered, 13mm Gyrojets to 12mm, or, .49 caliber, thus removing them
from the DD category.
In 1981,
BATF ended the 13mm Gyrojet problem entirely by removing them from the
DD category and classifying them as ‘Curios & Relics.’
Edward M. Owen, the chief of the BATF’s technical branch, wrote
a letter to Bob Mainhardt to notify him of this change. The letter is
reproduced below. Owen’s
letter also confirms that some Gyrojets were full auto.
This
article is based on letters and interviews with Robert Mainhardt that
were recorded in 1992, plus data published by MBAssociates and data from
the collections of Kevin Dockery, Leonard Yates and Tim Bixler.
Unfortunately, the author has lost contact with Mainhardt and
could not ask him any questions about the full the auto versions of his
Gyrojet rocket launchers.
Tim Bixler,
the co-developer of the ‘stealth’ radio submachine gun was able to supply some interesting anecdotes
about the full auto Gyrojets. See
the accompanying interview for more information about his full auto
Gyrojet and the thirty day, 1968 amnesty registration.
The
BATF Letter
Dear
Mr. Mainhardt:
This
refers to your letter of March 25, 1981, in which you provided
information regarding the production of Gyrojet Rocket Guns.
For your information, the following firearms have been have been
removed from the destructive device category and are no longer subject
to the provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA):
MBA
Gyrojet Rocket Guns, caliber 13mm,
semiautomatic version only, produced in 1968 or earlier,
serial number ranges A0001
through A0032, A001 through
A085, B010 through B411, and B5059 through B5692.
The
above firearms have also been determined curios or relics as that term
is defined in Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 178,
Section 178.11, thereby authorizing licensed collectors to acquire,
hold, or dispose of them as curios or relics subject to the provisions
of Title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapter 44, and the
regulations in Title 27, CFR, Part 178.
They are still firearms as defined in Title 18, U.S.C., Section
921 (a) (3).
Persons
having registered firearms in the above category should write the NFA
Branch and request that their file in the National Firearms Registration
and Transfer Record be amended to reflect that these firearms are no
longer subject to registration requirements.
Sincerely yours,
(signed)
Edward M. Owen, Jr.
Modern
Tests
Little has been written about MBA
Gyrojets. The few stories
that have appeared have, for the most part, simply repeated data that
was supplied by MBA.